The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has launched a sweeping criticism of the Federal Government following the release of its terrorism sponsors list, describing the document as a “misleading and politically driven publication” aimed at damaging the group’s image.
In an extensive statement issued on April 13, 2026, IPOB’s Media and Publicity Secretary, Emma Powerful, said the list represents what the group views as an attempt to manipulate public perception and divert attention from deeper national concerns.
The organisation, led by Nnamdi Kanu, questioned the credibility of the list, arguing that the process behind its compilation has not been made transparent and lacks what it described as verifiable evidence.
IPOB maintained that the development reflects a broader pattern in which dissenting voices and movements advocating self-determination are portrayed negatively, especially within the context of Nigeria’s ongoing security challenges.
The group further argued that categorising individuals or organisations without clear proof risks undermining the integrity of counter-terrorism efforts, warning that such actions could erode public trust in institutions responsible for national security.
According to the statement, IPOB believes the publication is not solely about addressing security threats but also about discouraging its supporters and limiting its influence, particularly among international observers and the diaspora community.
The group referenced past confrontations between security forces and civilians in the South-East, suggesting that such incidents raise concerns about how the government defines and responds to threats within the country.
It also reiterated concerns surrounding the continued detention of its leader, Nnamdi Kanu, linking it to what it described as a wider struggle over rights, justice, and political expression.
IPOB insisted that it remains a non-violent movement and rejected any association with terrorism, emphasizing that its objectives are rooted in the pursuit of self-determination, which it described as a fundamental and internationally recognised right.
The statement also highlighted what the group called a contradiction in its classification, noting that it operates in some countries under legal frameworks, a situation it says challenges the narrative being presented by Nigerian authorities.
Furthermore, IPOB warned that the implications of the list could extend beyond politics, potentially affecting individuals’ reputations and contributing to heightened tensions if not carefully addressed.
Despite the controversy, the group reaffirmed its commitment to its cause, stating that no amount of labeling, pressure, or public criticism would deter its agitation.
IPOB concluded by urging the international community to approach the issue with caution and objectivity, stressing the need for independent assessment of the claims and counterclaims surrounding the terrorism list.
As of the time of filing this report, the Federal Government has not issued an official response to IPOB’s reaction.
Post a Comment